<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Geek of the Week: Cody Franson</title>
		<description>Comments for Geek of the Week: Cody Franson at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>+/-</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/916-geek-of-the-week/5292-geek-of-the-week-cody-franson#comment-24372</link>
			<description>Fair point Skin Blues.  I agree that his +/- is unsustainable and did mention the same above in the article.  The unsustainable +/- is one of the reasons that I also said he won't remain as the 17th most valauble in the league at the end of the season.

Even without +/- though, Franson provides great value.  I ran the same league in FHG and omitted +/- as a category and Franson was still the 16th most valuable D-man in the entire league.  That's incredible value for a 28% owned guy.  The infliated +/- isn't the only thing giving him great value, it is all of the other things I outlined above.  His +/- will come down and his assists will likely slow down too, but the hits and shots are there as well as the PPP and I have reason to believe that his goal scoring will actually increase.

So, what I am saying is:
Will his +/- continue on its current pace?  No.  
Will Franson continue to be the 17th most valuable in the league?  No.  
But will he be a very viable fantasty asset and could he finish as a top 20-30 fantasy d-man like I suggested in the article?  I think it's entirely possible and for a WW addition I will be happy to be the GM to take a shot on him.

 
 - T-Camp</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:47:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>+/-</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/916-geek-of-the-week/5292-geek-of-the-week-cody-franson#comment-24370</link>
			<description>The real reason Franson is ranked so high in this format is is insane +/-. His value is not coming form his goals, so his shooting % is irrelevant. A +11 is basically equivalent to scoring 40 goals in a span of 16 games. Mystery solved. I`ll leave it up to you guys if you think a Leafs defenseman will keep up with an elite +/- pace (Hint: no Leafs defenseman has finished with a positive +/- since 2009-10 and the goalie situation is not exactly ideal). Not to mention what will happen if/when his PP time starts to dwindle and the Franson bubble bursts entirely. This goes for all players whose value is almost entirely propped up by their +/-. - Skin Blues</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:30:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thank You</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/916-geek-of-the-week/5292-geek-of-the-week-cody-franson#comment-24369</link>
			<description>Terry, thanks again for looking. That's so funny and coincidental that you mentioned picking up Smid because I grabbed him on WW a couple weeks ago. I had Karlsson on my team, and after he went down there wasn't really anyone on WW to fill in for him. Fortunately I have Shattenkirk, Hamhuis, and Franson to put up points, so I just filled in the rest of my D with H &amp; BkS guys like Smid, Mark Methot, Jan Hejda. - ChewBackes</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:49:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BkS</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/916-geek-of-the-week/5292-geek-of-the-week-cody-franson#comment-24360</link>
			<description>ChewBackes: Removing shots and adding blocked shots certainly doesn't help Franson.  12 blocks is a very low number for a d-man. Of the top 30 valued D in this league, Franson's block totaly would be the lowest.

Franson still contribute well in all other categories though and is certainly worth owning. As a WW pickup, that was a total steal for you like you said.

His actual ranking would depend on the rest of your league settings (how many D are rostered etc), but in terms of D-men in that league he would currently be ranked about 10th.  Lower than the league that counts shots but still impressive.  I wouldn't be surprised if he ends the season as a top 20-30 D in this league.  Great find on the WW.

If you are looking to compliment Franson with another value add, take a look at Luke Schenn (definitely worth an add) or Ladislav Smid (in a deeper format). Both have good value in your league and are widely available...and both will help to atone for Franson's lacking in BkS. - T-Camp</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:23:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/916-geek-of-the-week/5292-geek-of-the-week-cody-franson#comment-24358</link>
			<description>Picked him up a week ago off the waiver wire. He has always had thevoffensive ability. He just needed to be given the right opportunity to show it. - coldsquad2002</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:41:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What About A League w/o SOG but with also Blocked Shots?</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/916-geek-of-the-week/5292-geek-of-the-week-cody-franson#comment-24356</link>
			<description>Terry, good stuff. Franson went undrafted in my league and has been a great steal for me off the waiver wire. What about a league that scores Goals, Assists, PPP, +/-, Hits, and Blocked Shots? Was wondering how that would affect Franson's value since SOG is no longer included. Let me know if you have a chance to take a look. Cheers &amp; Thanks - ChewBackes</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:17:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
