<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Can Malkin or Crosby be Unseated?</title>
		<description>Comments for Can Malkin or Crosby be Unseated? at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:57:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/917-holding-court/5129-can-malkin-or-crosby-be-unseated-#comment-23579</link>
			<description>This question only makes me think of last playoffs, 1st round when Giroux sat both these babies in their highchairs single handedly ;D  They've been unseated as players and only a matter of time until they can't touch the Ross either. - Medeiros</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:26:55 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>According to the handy dandy Frozen Pool tool, Staal was on the ice for only one of Crosby’s ...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/917-holding-court/5129-can-malkin-or-crosby-be-unseated-#comment-23573</link>
			<description>I believe this is a misinterpretation of the statistics of a type I often see related to Frozen Pool. The fact that Staal wasn't on the ice when Crosby and Malkin scored doesn't mean he was irrelevant to that scoring; as mentioned earlier in the piece, it was this very fact that helped elevate their production. This is because Staal was on the ice in the tough defensive situations so that Crosby and Malkin could be out there (without Staal) during the prime scoring opportunities. - Hey_Robbie</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:15:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
