Comments for Cage Match - The Goalie Tourney at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://hockey.dobbersports.com Sun, 19 May 2013 20:56:53 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/5016-cage-match-the-goalie-tourney#comment-23065 As I explained in the opener of this series as well as the opening paragraph of this week's column Rinne, Quick and Lundqvist were so far ahead of the rest of the pack that having them in the tournament would be pointless. Instead, there will be a follow up Cage Match article after the tournament is over featuring those three. In the meantime, please enjoy this battle to be the number four goalie in fantasy hockey this season! - metaldude26 Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:30:45 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/5016-cage-match-the-goalie-tourney#comment-23064 Why wasnt rinne in this tourney? - buck0198 Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:49:06 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/5016-cage-match-the-goalie-tourney#comment-23060 I honestly can't believe we're even having the discussion over whether MAF is an elite net minder. This is a case of one bad - and it was awful - playoff series and the whole world forgets his amazing regular season play over the past two seasons. MAF over Price will probably have a lot to do with team context, but don't write off MAF. At this time last year, people were considering him a top-3 keeper goaltender. Don't sleep on MAF. Again. - mounD Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:22:00 +0100