<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Lockout Beneficiaries, Part I: Long Island &amp; Philadelphia</title>
		<description>Comments for Lockout Beneficiaries, Part I: Long Island &amp; Philadelphia at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:04:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>philly</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/4863-lockout-beneficiaries-part-i-long-island#comment-22352</link>
			<description>is the fact that you don't mention Briere as part of the core an oversight or on purpose?
do you not consider him as one of the Flyers top players? - hawkdog</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:10:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Heh!</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/4863-lockout-beneficiaries-part-i-long-island#comment-22347</link>
			<description>Well, you did it again - made me think.  Spezza dominated scoring in the AHL during the lockout - Cammer was second, actually Wellwood 4th and Staal 10th - Cam Ward had a very good year as well, along with Labarbera and Harding.  Staal and Ward followed up with a cup, of course.

Never thought about the advantage of the development time the lockout affords to certain teams and players.

We seem to have a pretty quick volley going on with negotiations - wonder what the odds of a lockout really are? - Shoeless</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:56:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
