<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Fantasy Hockey Site Review: Fantrax</title>
		<description>Comments for Fantasy Hockey Site Review: Fantrax at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 9 out of 9 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:02:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Fantrax Question</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22330</link>
			<description>I use CBS for 4 leagues. Very interested in paying less. Wondering why none of the revues are mentioning about Auction draft. Primary reason why we use CBS. Can set your own auction dollar amount and keep them as your salary cap.
Can you do this with Fantrax?  - mikejlees</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:26:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fantrax</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22253</link>
			<description>Our league is over 20 years old ... we were on Officepools for years until they made a bunch of changes ... we ended up on Fantrax a few years ago.

The only thing missing that Officepools had was a rookie spot ... we have a custom spot for it, but I need to monitor each teams rookie spot each period to ensure they didn't stick a non-rookie in the &quot;rookie&quot; spot.

We had roster moves Tuesdays and Fridays ... but &quot;free agent&quot; pickups and trades were daily (as long as they didn't require a roster move) ... we had to change everything to TUE and FRI due to the periods being locked.

Overall, it's been great. - torrock</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:26:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22250</link>
			<description>I'm having trouble logging into the forum for whatever reason so I'll just post my question here in the hopes that some keen Dobberhockey member will be able to answer it:

I am thinking about joining a league on fantrax with the league setting set as &quot;Head to Head (Rotisserie/Category Based) Single Win&quot;.

I was wondering if somebody could tell me what this setting would be comparable to in yahoo. I am currently used to yahoo's classic head-to-head league setup.
[b][/b]

Thanks! - wally1</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:38:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks!</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22242</link>
			<description>I hope you found the review informative. After being a commish for a couple of years I just knew I had to be the one to review this site. Fantrax is a step and a half ahead of any other fantasy sports provider out there. Hope you enjoyed it! - Blair Alexander</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:08:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22224</link>
			<description>Great review. Two of my three hockey leagues use Fantrax, and I love it. I was a user/manager long before I started writing for the site, and the experience is one the reasons why I wanted to contribute. For a detailed dynasty league, this is by far my favourite.   

Oh and thanks for the plug! haha - GMGates</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:17:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22222</link>
			<description>We have used Fantrax for several years now also. Used to use Officepools.com, which was also good, but ran into some problems one year with a new site. Just in the last little while we have started used the Max Games option which adds another element of strategy to the pool. Don't have really anything bad to say about it. - DarthVain</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:36:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>we use it too</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22214</link>
			<description>Our league is almost 20 years old, have been through a few different sites including the old TQstats and CBS.  Have used Fantrax the last 2 years, I for sure give them a thumbs up. If you have a rotisserie with keepers, farm, and salaries (contracts too)...I just feel they are the best. - tedduf</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 04:37:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22211</link>
			<description>We've used fantrax for 3 o 4 years now.  All of the options were a bit daunting at the beginning bit you can play around fairly easy to see how the site reacts.  Having the ability to restore the league if needed is a good insurance policy as well.  The support team is great and they are always adding new features every year.  I would recommend this site for any serious keeper league. - fantasyjunkie08</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:44:46 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/hoos/4842-fantasy-hockey-site-review-fantrax#comment-22209</link>
			<description>thanks for the post. My league has been looking for an alternative, hopefully fantrax solves the problem - donpaulo</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:56:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
