<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>April 13, 2012</title>
		<description>Comments for April 13, 2012 at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 9 out of 9 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:04:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20392</link>
			<description>@Mick

well the NHL has spoken and there was a fine

I noticed you overlooked Zet's illegal hit. Are you a wings fan ?

fyi as a rangers fan I have no dog in that hunt - paul</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:34:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LOL</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20391</link>
			<description>So sweet, Canucks can lick my............. - Adrian Keogh</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:03:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20390</link>
			<description>the simple fact that he grabbed a players head and drove it into the glass is what makes me call for a suspension. that was not a hockey move whatsoever. a deliberate attempt to hurt a player. just disgusting.

how about them flyers? so many overlooked their never-give-up attitude the past month or two.  - bill</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:29:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20389</link>
			<description>Darcy - what blinders am I wearing? Your comment makes little sense. - Jeff Angus</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:15:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@Paul</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20388</link>
			<description>as a rule, the guys who retaliates generally gets the punishment.
I think cracking a guys helmut is sufficient for at least one game suspension.

the idea that this is playoff hockey and they should be allowed to be goons is such BS cause the refs are not all on the same page,
each series is called different

Don Cherry is a borderline dementia case in a clown outfit - mick</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:39:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20386</link>
			<description>&quot;A brutal, vicious, violent head shot&quot; ... sigh, gimme a break.  Like Don Cherry said (as much as it pains me to quote him), if Weber REALLY wanted to hurt Zetts, he could have easily.

Get over the Canucks loss, take a breath, take the blinders off ... this is playoff hockey! - Darcy S</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:17:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Weber hit</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20385</link>
			<description>I have to agree with you Paul, Zetterberg's hit was arguably dirty with 3 seconds to go and Weber retaliated inappropriately. They should both be fined, and Weber maybe should have been suspended.
That being said, I don't know how you call the Weber move a &quot;brutal, vicious, violent head shot&quot;...that is a ridiculous over-exaggeration. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyJB42HY_J0&amp;feature=related - Marc</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:05:21 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20383</link>
			<description>no excuse on Weber but Zet clearly hit him in the numbers from behind for which there is also no excuse. 2 dirty plays, yet it seems Weber gets 99% of the criticism. Just saying...  - paul</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:32:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/home-mainmenu-1/24-rambling/4561-april-13-2012#comment-20382</link>
			<description>k. shattenkirk looks a lot like k. letang right before everything came together at an elite level.
he is going to be a very very good defenceman soon. - InnocentBystander</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:27:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
