<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Top 10+ Fantasy-Based Draft Defensemen Rankings</title>
		<description>Comments for Top 10+ Fantasy-Based Draft Defensemen Rankings at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Ebert and Reinhart</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/906-the-deans-list/4423-top-10-fantasy-based-draft-defensemen-rankings#comment-19700</link>
			<description>Finn and Koekkoek are definitely way ahead of Ebert.  Nick Ebert has a great shot (one of the best in the draft) but in my 5 viewings of him this season, he only impressed me once and it was probably because he wasn't simply &quot;invisible&quot; like the other four times.  The skills are there but he's a player that comes with attitude and consistency problems.  He simply doesn't work hard enough.

Reinhart:  Here's a player that I considered in the HM section but didn't want the list to get too long so I included some longer shots. Reinhart is a project defenseman but the skills are certainly there (just needs to improve his skating a bit). I'd certainly consider him if you wanted a bit of a lower ceiling with more likelihood of reaching the NHL type of player.  I wouldn't knock anyone for picking him ahead of anyone after Schmaltz on the list above.

Ebert isn't a terrible option either if you have a later pick but I'd rather have someone else take him than gamble on him with a higher pick. - Dean Youngblood</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:02:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/906-the-deans-list/4423-top-10-fantasy-based-draft-defensemen-rankings#comment-19668</link>
			<description>On the same note where does Reinhardt fit in on this list - Donesh</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:17:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nick Ebert</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/906-the-deans-list/4423-top-10-fantasy-based-draft-defensemen-rankings#comment-19667</link>
			<description>I was just wondering what you thought of Nick Ebert... I know he's had a rough year but it's hard to imagine that he's fallen so far that clear D-first players like koekkoek and finn are ahead of him... Just curious as to the reason Ebert isn't on the list - Donesh</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:10:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>High Potential Dmen</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/906-the-deans-list/4423-top-10-fantasy-based-draft-defensemen-rankings#comment-19653</link>
			<description>Your first paragraph reminded me of my drafting approach this past September. I came out of last season with a perspective that my high end defense core was the biggest factor in my success, and that defensemen were generally undervalued in my league. This year I made sure to draft a defense with lots of potential in my limited keeper.
I picked: Doughty, Streit, Markov, Shattenkirk, E. Johnson

Streit is the only one above thirty points with twenty games to go, and at a minus-17 you better believe that he's worth as little as any of the others in a a six-keeper setup.

I knew coming out of the of the draft very well that I selected a risky defense core. Luckily I was able to bring Erik Karlsson up to salvage my underperforming defense. - Van Mason</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:57:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
