<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Cage Match Tournament - Howe Bracket, Round 1</title>
		<description>Comments for Cage Match Tournament - Howe Bracket, Round 1 at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:52:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan-Sharp</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/4409-cage-match-tournament-howe-bracket-round-1#comment-19567</link>
			<description>The irony of this situation is that this whole Sharp is better short-term thing is actually a new phenomenon. Prior to this season these two were basically neck and neck. Only this season has Sharp leapfrogged Ryan in scoring. - steve laidlaw</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:50:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan v Sharp</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/4409-cage-match-tournament-howe-bracket-round-1#comment-19565</link>
			<description>I also think this in an interesting result. Ryan was very highly touted coming into the league and helped by a few highlight reel goals he has never lost that cache.  Sharp just keeps getting it done.  It shows that GMs still fall for the allure of a potential breakout campaign (which will never happen IMO) overlooking a player who consistently performs at a higher level.  For me, no-contest Sharp wins!  - ktox</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:27:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan vs Sharp</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/4409-cage-match-tournament-howe-bracket-round-1#comment-19564</link>
			<description>That's a very interesting outcome, and telling w/regard to how GMs go about determining value.

I would agree Ryan's got the upside on Sharp, generally, and that's what this is about.  But I could see playing the Sharp is better bang for the buck angle too. Better cost/benefit ratio as it were.  I think that would be a valid argument.

But spread out on the table, everything being equal and I had to pick one...???? Ryan.

These are great matchups. - bomm</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:57:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/4409-cage-match-tournament-howe-bracket-round-1#comment-19563</link>
			<description>Thanks Ross but I gotta give props to the DobberHockey writers and forum posters who helped me out. They were in essence the selection committee. Once the players were seeded then I went after matchups I thought would be fun but this tournament would be nothing without the selection committee.  - steve laidlaw</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:39:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Matchups</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/laidlaw/4409-cage-match-tournament-howe-bracket-round-1#comment-19562</link>
			<description>Great job on the matchups! Look forward to seeing the comments and results throughout the tournament! - Ross The Boss Palmer</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:33:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
