<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>August 21, 2011</title>
		<description>Comments for August 21, 2011 at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 8 out of 8 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:29:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15952</link>
			<description>Agreed. I hate the shootout as well. - Jeff Angus</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:15:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15951</link>
			<description>When the shootout comes on I Always change the channel. It is the single dumbest thing about the NHL. - Superchief</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:35:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Verification Line</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15950</link>
			<description>That rule change is a FAIL.  Put a transmitter in the puck so you know 100% if the puck has crossed the line even if you cannot see it.  Make the goal reviewers redundant and speed up the games. - Atomic Wedgy</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:01:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15949</link>
			<description>lol ok let me give this another try. I understand the current rule I guess I just don't understand why it would be in contention for a change? I'm having a hard time understanding how calling icing while shorthanded would help the game? I firmly believe offense comes through the flow of the game. Nothing I hate more than stoppage in play. Thanks. - Hockey Hoser</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:27:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15948</link>
			<description>I'm saying, Mr. Big Ev, that a perennial fantasy hockey champion with a Degree and a Doctorate in Business Management and a lot of charisma, who played some hockey at the midget level, would be a successful GM. Was that not clear? Nothing against the current crop of GM's who are ex-players, I just find it difficult to believe that if you interviewed the top 10 million candidates for the job on the planet, that they would even crack the top thousand. I know I get too philosophical sometimes...

No icing while shorthanded: Currently, you are allowed to ice the puck and it doesn't get whistled down.

 - Dobber</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Huh?</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15947</link>
			<description>Ok, another one. Forgive me if I'm completely just missing what's right in front of me:  

&quot;No Icing While Shorthanded&quot;....This one baffles me, could someone please explain to me the logic?

Dobber you mentioned you'd pass it because &quot;players don’t do that with five-minute disadvantages, so why in the hell would they do it on a two-minute disadvantage&quot;. I'm not sure I follow you here either, what do you mean they don't do it with a five-minute disadvantage? Do what exactly? Ice the puck? I always thought that was acceptable being short handed on the ice. Cheers. - Hockey Hoser</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:43:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15946</link>
			<description>are you saying you think a fantasy hockey champion would be a successful GM? If so... - Big Ev</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:39:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>It's not what you know...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/other-features-mainmenu-89/archived-ramblings/3903-august-21-2011#comment-15945</link>
			<description>it's who know...isn't? Out of fairness, Joe Nieuwendyk's defense...he did play 3 seasons at  Cornell, a reputable and well established Ivy League school. Whether he received a degree or actually went to any real courses besides pool management 101 is up for debate. By all means, I'd love to hear from Joe on this one.  - Hockey Hoser</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:27:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
