<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Right Wing Rant</title>
		<description>Comments for The Right Wing Rant at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:53:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Top 100 Roto Players released</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/46-gates-imbeau/3457-the-right-wing-rant#comment-11967</link>
			<description>Check out the [url=http://www.dobberhockey.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1801:top-100-roto-players&amp;catid=26:rankings]Top 100 Roto Players[/url]!

As for Kane he's ranked a little lower due to the fact that past G, A and PPP he's only average in the other categories. Mind you, he's ranked 41 in February, but could move up a spot or two to be in the top 40. If you look at the guide, you will visually see why RW's like Carter and Perry rank higher than Kane.

Cheers! - GMGates</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:30:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What about Kane?</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/46-gates-imbeau/3457-the-right-wing-rant#comment-11912</link>
			<description>Does Carter's multi-positional status help or hinder? Should he become a centre, I would suggest it significantly hinders him. He is playing wing this year. He has very few faceoffs. I've got my fingers crossed that he's a winger next year!

Patrick Kane if very fancy stuff, has awesome age factor, and is proven. I would wonder that he should have made the list, even if you were adding another commodity to the discussion. Yes, lousy PIM, and although I haven't looked it up, I suspect lower hits and blocked shots. He's not a warrior, in the same fashion as a Perry.  - Jocular Hockey Manager</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:40:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/46-gates-imbeau/3457-the-right-wing-rant#comment-11910</link>
			<description>[quote]None of these guys are over or underrated, and none of them are under the wire in any pool. [/quote]

Good argument, but this is the first part of many to come so I had to start with the best.

Tomorrow you'll be pleasantly surprised.

GMG - GMGates</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:37:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>would prefer to see more depth</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/46-gates-imbeau/3457-the-right-wing-rant#comment-11907</link>
			<description>this article focuses on three of the biggest names at the position.  Your opening paragraph states:

&quot;To your benefit, the Market Buzz series wastes no time in revealing a player’s true rotisserie value and focus on separating the underrated from the overrated.&quot;

None of these guys are over or underrated, and none of them are under the wire in any pool.

But that's not what this article does at all...I wish it did.  Some constructive criticism. - Repent Tokyo</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:24:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/46-gates-imbeau/3457-the-right-wing-rant#comment-11893</link>
			<description>Great stuff Gates.  See you over in the forums. - robert finkelstein</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:13:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
