<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Don’t Mess With Chemistry</title>
		<description>Comments for Don’t Mess With Chemistry at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:39:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/justin-goldman/3330-dont-mess-with-chemistry#comment-10674</link>
			<description>Interestingly, it does seem like Bobrovsky has gotten a little shakier since two goalies started peeking over his shoulder.  (His December numbers are more in the .900 range with an GAA over 3).  Maybe that's to be expected of a rookie tender, but I don't think a cup contender is looking for a goalie who bends to the first signs of pressure, so this dilemma isn't as straightforward as the overall stats seem to indicate.

Bobrovsky's two-way contract gives Philly a lot of options.. the most obvious being that they can keep all the cake if Leighton and Boucher find solid ground.

If Leighton is really out of the picture, I still like his potential in the NHL this season.  Philly could gain some cap space or fill some other need..  either way, there are teams that would give him a test run and I think he would respond well.

Big picture.. I'm actually a little worried for Bobrovsky this season (outside of further injuries) and I'm not so worried about Leighton (again, outside of injuries).  Boucher will just be Boucher, nothing so far has really changed that. - Edge</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:06:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/justin-goldman/3330-dont-mess-with-chemistry#comment-10673</link>
			<description>&quot;goalie dilemma(s)&quot; = goalie controversy

hmmm....  - Steven Wadzinski</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:56:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
