<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>DobberHockey's Expert Panel - Second Round</title>
		<description>Comments for DobberHockey's Expert Panel - Second Round at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:33:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Apparently, I'm not an expert</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/2770-dobberhockeys-expert-panel-second-round#comment-5993</link>
			<description>Well, I'm not going to quit my day job and go into the prediction business. I'm 0-for-3 so far in the second round. I take some solace in the fact that my predictions matched TSN's Bob McKenzie. - Ryan Van Horne</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 18:12:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Give me SJ</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/2770-dobberhockeys-expert-panel-second-round#comment-5807</link>
			<description>I'm a Wings fan and I give them no chance of beating San Jose.  I think the Wings are spent for this season and San Jose is being taken for granted.  

As well as Phoenix played this season and in the playoffs, Detroit still should have had a much easier time with them.

I'll predict the Flyers to play the Sharks.  The &quot;Pronger Playoff Effect&quot; means these aren't last year's Flyers. - SuperOne</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:43:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>looks right except for San Jose</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/2770-dobberhockeys-expert-panel-second-round#comment-5798</link>
			<description>I like the picks, except for Detroit over San Jose.  Nabokov got better as the series went on.  The big three weren't scoring and the lower tiers carried the team.  I worry about the D as Colorado proved San Jose vunerable on the break away.   At a minimum you have to say a fight with 7 games required.   - mike hess</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:34:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/2770-dobberhockeys-expert-panel-second-round#comment-5786</link>
			<description>The only lesson I learned from round one is that I am an idiot. :)

Let's see if the reverse hex works with my CHI/VAN pick... - angus</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:00:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>round 2</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/2770-dobberhockeys-expert-panel-second-round#comment-5785</link>
			<description>i am taking montreal and vancouver for the final 2.  I think mtrl wil take the pens if Halak continues to play as good. - mick</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:34:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MTL in 6</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/jeff-angus/2770-dobberhockeys-expert-panel-second-round#comment-5784</link>
			<description>Angus didn't you learn your lesson in round one, take a chance on the Habs
8) - Wade Colborne</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:32:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
