<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Statistical Anomalies</title>
		<description>Comments for Statistical Anomalies at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:44:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/amato/2467-statistical-anomalies#comment-3603</link>
			<description>RE: Shootout numbers

Yeah I didn't really do my homework on the shoot out numbers, I just looked at them and though whoa 80% efficiency... that's a bit high isn't it? But as you said shootouts rarely happen and isn't as stable as say sh% where you have a larger bank of data to choose from, so there is a big room for number sways either way.   - Ryan Ma</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:24:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Excellent work</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/amato/2467-statistical-anomalies#comment-3601</link>
			<description>Astute observations. Very excellent work! Thanks! - Jocular Hockey Manager</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:55:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/amato/2467-statistical-anomalies#comment-3597</link>
			<description>Oh, and as for Datsyuk, I think you're right that a correction is in order, but not so much because the league average is 20%.  Over the previous four years, Datsyuk has gone 3/6, 5/10, 4/10, and 5/10 in the shootout.  Seems like he's a long-haul 50% shooter.

Shootout sample sizes are so small that any one year's stats are pretty meaningless though.  It would only take two misses to return Datsyuk to his 50% zone.  A great example is Wolski - 10/12 last year, 1/7 this year.

I like these articles; good info to contemplate. - Guy Incognito</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:09:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/amato/2467-statistical-anomalies#comment-3594</link>
			<description>Toews was 6 for 10 in the shootout last year too, and of course he showed an aptitude for it before then.  I don't see why his 4 of 6 this year needs much of an adjustment.

Crosby on the other hand was 3 of 10 last year and is now 5 of 6, so that seems more in need of a correction unless he figured something out along the way (which I wouldn't put past him - I did hear something about someone advising him to slow down and stick handle to make the goalie move his legs and look for holes low).  Still, 5 for 6 is unsustainable for the long haul. - Guy Incognito</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:10:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/columnistsarticles-mainmenu-77/amato/2467-statistical-anomalies#comment-3535</link>
			<description>nice job man, i enjoyed it - mm12</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:23:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
