Comments for Ow Carolina! at http://hockey.dobbersports.com , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments http://hockey.dobbersports.com Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:12:56 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/russ-miller/2361-ow-carolina#comment-2563 Hey Greg, You are of course correct. The Caps were 3-1-2 without OV in the line up. They do have three losses without him, but two of them were OTL. Good catch! - Russ Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:57:49 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/russ-miller/2361-ow-carolina#comment-2546 By my calculations if we are doing predictions on the entire year for those stats, Rod Brind’Amour is on pace for as +/- of -63... - Ryan Lenethen Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:50:37 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/russ-miller/2361-ow-carolina#comment-2538 You wrote, Washington is 7-1-2 in their last ten and much of that has been without the services of two-time reigning Hart trophy winner Ovechkin. The Caps are 3-3 without the big guy. - Greg Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:59:07 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/russ-miller/2361-ow-carolina#comment-2534 Sorry to bring it up as the article had some very interesting facts, information and insight in it. While I still don't agree, I will leave it at that. Thanks for the good read. - Mervillian Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:04:41 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/russ-miller/2361-ow-carolina#comment-2533 I checked TSN and it's 80-110: http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=2096 The odds of Gaborik playing in 80 games this year are slim to none though, so it's really only a theoretical projection! - Russ Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:43:21 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/russ-miller/2361-ow-carolina#comment-2526 does it really matter what he's on pace for? was it seriously necessary to post that? - zzzzzzzz Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:13:36 +0100 http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index.php/russ-miller/2361-ow-carolina#comment-2525 I believe Gaborik is actually on pace for 73 games and 100 points and not 80/110. - Mervillian Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:09:15 +0100