![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
what duo you would like to own in a 1 pt keeper league with no position requirement
BOYES + Wolski or Willaims and redden
__________________
Keeper League( 10 gm), 1 goalie + 1 team, pt only PURCELL, CONACHER, , EBERLE, GIROUX, SUTER, BENN, OSHIE, TAVARES, J.STAAL, BERGERON, WHEELER, DUPUIS, MUELLER,ELIAS, BERGLUND, BRUNNER,STREIT,CALLAHAN PHILLY LUNDQVIST BENCH: RHN,PAAJARVI,KUZNETSOV,J.SCHULTZ, C.ATKINSON,VOKOUN(G) |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
boyes and wolski
__________________
H2H Points Protect- roster:18 + prospects:7 F- Tavares, M.Richards, Lecavalier, Kovalchuk, Horton, Hossa, Purcell, Hartnell, Pominville, Simmonds D- Doughty, Hedman, Boyle, Meszaros, Wideman G- Fleury, Halak, Vokoun Prospects- F- Bowman, Coyle, Adam, Zibenajad, Geoffrion D- Savard, Wishart G- Hackett, Jones |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don\'t know what DUO you receive. Both are good in a sens I like Williams and he proved is value so but wolski and boyes should be good too.
Mixed feeeling in my case |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does \"1 pt\" mean no PIMS or +/-? If PIMs and/or +/- count in your league I\'d take williams + redden. Points only I\'d take Wolski and Boyes if you are pretty sure Smyth\'s arrival in CO doesn\'t push Wolski off one of the top two lines in CO.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
without position requirements most average forwards will even outscore a dman...take BOYES + Wolski
__________________
2010 - 2011 Signature Team RFHL: Founded 1989 Rochester, NY 10 Man Keeper League G, A, PTS, 2W+OL, SV%, GAA C: Tavares, Kopitar, Benn, Roy LW: Hall, Vanek, van Riemsdyke, Nyquist RW: Seguin, Carter, Yakupov, Tarasenko D: Green, Fowler, Elliott, J.Schultz, Streit, Wisniewski G: Price, Ward |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Boyes: 46 points in 81 games - in Boston and St. Louis
Wolski: 50 points in 76 games Williams: 67 points in 82 games Redden: 36 points in 64 games If this is as a trade offer then I would ask for a forward rather than a defenceman (Redden). If it isn\'t a trade then I don\'t understand why you would draft a defenceman rather than a forward. I guess I am suggesting that in comparing these two duos: Wolski/Boyes and Williams/Redden, we are comparing apples and oranges (considering 1 points for goals and assists with no positional requirements). In comparing the duos I consider that the \'balance\' favors Wolski/Boyes. Boyes seems to have found a home in St. Louis. He really started to produce once he arrived from Boston. His role will be higher. I think that his point production will improve this year. Wolski will improve on his point production of last year. Williams might have some slight improvement. Redden: well, see my comments above. I would not expect much more from him. Unless, I am missing something this clearly favors Wolski/Boyes. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Boyes, Wolski! Accepting Redden without positional requirement= funny farm:woohoo:
__________________
My keeper squad on this 10 team, no positional requirement league (except 1 goalie and 1 NHL team). Points only: Parise, Kopitar, Hemsky, Brunette, J Staal, Okposo, Doan, Roy, O.Jokinen, Giroux, Krejci, Oshie, Eberle, Little, Filpulla, Steen, Filatov, Hudler, H.Lundqvist, + NHL Team LA. |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 AM.














Linear Mode

