![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Goals, Assists, +/- and PIMS...
Who do you prefer, and why? Puck
__________________
'To be is to do' - Socrates....'To do is to be '- Sartre.......... 'To do be do be do' - Sinatra. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Moulson pretty easily for me here. Lupul has shown one good season with Kessel....but I can't go against a winger who has fantastic chemistry with John Tavares and three straight 30 goal seasons. Not close.
__________________
12 team H2H Keeper G,A,PP,PIM,SOG W,GAA,SV%,SO C:Giroux,Zberg,Marleau,Kadri LW:Ovi,Neal,Pach,Benn RW:Perry,MSL,Wheeler D:Yandle,Subban,Edler,OEL G: Lundqvist,Miller,MAF 12 Team H2H R,2b,3b,HR,RBI,AVG,SB,BB,K,E W,L,SV,HLD,K,ERA,WHIP C:Buck 1B:Santana 2B:Kipnis 3B:Zimmer SS:Tulo LF:Marte CF:McCutch RF:Pence Util:Ozuna SP:Cain,Moore,Latos,Kennedy,Ryu,Guthrie RP:Henderson,Rivera,League,Gregerson,Herrera DL:Hart,Anderson,Bailey |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly my thoughts.
__________________
I went to a fight the other night and a hockey game broke out. - Rodney Dangerfield |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Said it all here. Lupul's good but he's a serious injury risk, Moulson is pretty damn durable. Moulson is a total drain on PIM which hurts a bit where Lupul will at least give you a little something in that category. But I trust in Moulson a lot more.
__________________
20 Team Dynasty (points per) - G (25, 50 for defense) A (25) PIM (3) +/- (5) PPG (15) SHG (25) OTG (15) GWG (25) HTr (50) GP (2) HIT (1) BLK (1) Use actual NHL salary F: Malkin, Tavares, E. Kane, Parenteau, Havlat, Tarasenko, Galchenyuk, Brunner, Boyes, Kruger, Helm, M. Martin, Bergenheim, Carcillo, Stajan D: Green, Ehrhoff, Ekman-Larsson, Coburn, Daley, Postma G: Fleury, Mason, Montoya Farm: Grigorenko, Grimaldi, Kucherov, D. Shore, Hartikainen, Stransky, Kerdiles, Joensuu, Pageau, Murphy, Ceci, Klefbom, Thrower, Donovan, Ekholm, Lehner, Dansk, Poulin, Nilsson, Andersen |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Moulson over Lupul. Moulson has shown both great chemistry and consistency playing with Tavares, and there aren't many guys out there that are as good for 30+ goals on the season like Moulson is. I also believe that Moulson has room to improve and will improve his totals playing along Tavares for years to come. The only real flaw to Moulson is that he's a Lady Bing canidate, which means he's of zero use in the PIM department. Lupul when healthy is a good player maybe even a slight edge over Moulson, but doesn't have nearly the same track record of conisistency, and of course is injury prone, and another thing I think he has going against him in this battle is that while his chemistry with Kessel is good, he doesn't play with an elite center like Tavares.
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM.













Linear Mode

