Points only keeper, 1st team in sig.
Should I pursue a deal that boils down to
getting his Spezza for my Nash?

Thanks!

__________________
9 team keeper league
1 G, 1 A, 2 Win, 1 Shutout
Ice 9 forwards, 3 defensemen, 1 goalie bi-weekly
Malkin - P. Kane - Stastny - Carter - Voracek - Nash - Williams - Benn - van Riemsdyk - Conacher - Berglund - Tarasenko - O'Reilly
Weber - Doughty - Del Zotto - Goligoski
Howard - Quick

8 team keeper league
1 G, 1 A, 2 Win, 1 Shutout
Ice 9 forwards, 3 defensemen, 1 goalie bi-weekly
Couture - van Riemsdyk - Thornton - Marleau - Stastny - Heatley - Voracek - Lupul - Koivu - Conacher - Zajac - Grigorenko - Carter - Roy
Letang - Karlsson - Goligoski - Fowler
Ward - Rinne

points only ~ yes absolutely prefer Spezza over Nash.

__________________

Spezza is a points machine. I'd take him over Nash any day.

I'll take Nash in here since he as a better supporting cast and that Spezza has a band aid boy history. Sure, last year was a good one for Spezza in terms of points and GP but he missed a lot of games the previous 2 years so it's kind of a gamble for me.

__________________
10 teams keeper/points only (keep 17)
12 FWD, 3 DEF, 2 G

FWD/DEF: G=1pt A=1pt
G: W=2pts OTL= 1pt SO= 3pts

Salary Cap league (players salaries) 64.3M

F: T. Seguin, J. Eberle, J. Neal, J. Silfverberg, A. Semin, M. Grandlund, E. Malkin, D. Roy, J. Thornton.

D: K. Shattenkirk, J. Carlson, T. Barrie.

G: C. Schneider, J. Quick.

Spezza is more of an injury risk, but he's better by a fair amount than Nash, to negate that fact.

Nash has a new team, more support for point scoring, but I'd still take Spezza based on numbers in past seasons. Spezza didn't have much support at all around him last year, yet he managed to score over a point per game.

__________________
Nashville Predators Fan Since Day 1