![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I finally found out where I am drafting next year and the chances of me getting an elite forward are slim to none. So I'm going the goalie route (1st signiture). Who would you rather have?
I am completely split on this decision. I already have Smith also. Lundy - A rock for years, good team around him, and he should be fresh (as Torts limits his GP) Quick - Probably the best goalie last year, won the cup, will play more which helps but the cup hangover / playing more might hurt him a bit. Who would you rather have? - Throw in another name if you feel like they will be better but to me it's a 2 horse race for the top spot.
__________________
2010-2011 League Champion - ROTO 2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2,G | G, A, PPP, +/-, PIM, BS, W, GAA, SV% C: Tavares, Thornton LW: Benn, Hall RW: Semin, Sharp D: Edler, Carlson, OEL, Hedman G: Smith, Miller, Fasth, Markstrom, Bernier B: Wheeler, Weisniewski H2H Keeper League [5F, 2D, 1G] 2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D,1 Ult, 1 G -H2H Daily Start - G, A, +/-, Hits, BS, PPP, SHP - W, SV, GAA, SO C:RNH, Ribeiro, Backes, Kesler LW: Parise, Landeskog, E. Kane RW: Ryan, Yakupov, Clarkson D: OEL, Keith, Boyle, Wisniewski, Smid, Georges G: Schneider, Varlamov, Nabokov, Bishop IR: Wisniewski |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
10 Team NHL Keeper League (Keep 6) Points only (F/D 1pt/G 1pt/A, Goalie 2pt/W 3pt/SO) Starters: 12 Forwards, 6 Defense, 2 Goalie (82 game cap at each position) Bench: 3 Any Position No IR F- Giroux, Backstrom, Tavares, Kovalchuk, Getzlaf, Benn, Iginla, M.Koivu, Hartnell, Carter, Cammalleri, Callahan D- Byfuglien, Green, Boyle, Goligoski, Visnovsky, Wizniewski G- Rask, Elliott BN- Brodeur, Saad, Beauchemin Picks - 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 ***2012-2013 League Champion*** ***2011-2012 Runner Up*** ***2010-2011 League Champion*** |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hah...honestly, flip a coin between these two. They're both great goaltenders and I think they will be compared a lot as people start looking towards one-year drafts.
If it were me, I'd take Lundqvist, just because he's had a bit more time to relax and I think the Rangers will come back hungry. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Assuming league in sig I take Lundy - I think his SV%/GAA will be better by a small margin and thats 2/3 scoring cats for your goalies. In a league with SV's counted, I'd lean towards Quick.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Agree here. Lundy is more proven. The Rangers will be hungry once again. Quick's cup hangover concerns me just a little bit; enough to take Lundy. But can't go wrong with either IMO.
__________________
Points only keeper League, weekly head to head, 2RW, 2LW, 2C, 4D, 1 G , (goalies 2pts for W +3 for SO) LW: Gaborik, Landeskog, Burrows C: Seguin, Skinner, Berglund, Nyquist, Lombardi RW: Eberle, Oshie, Doan, Silfverberg D: Doughty, Carlson, Ekman-Larsson, Carle G: Price , Schneider, Nabokov |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.















Linear Mode

