![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Year--------Green-----our points---Rank(D)-------Kane-----our pts----rank(F) 2010--------------------41----------51st-----------------------102-------25th 2009--------------------118---------1st-----------------------124--------13th 2008--------------------139---------1st by 35 pts--------------99--------45th 2007--------------------96----------2nd-----------------------97--------45th AND he wants Hemsky. Yes he is injury prone, but I would rather bury him myself than do this deal. Last edited by Princeton; 05-06-2011 at 01:59 PM. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can see both sides here.
Kane is way more reliable, and is a lock to be in a prime situation for the next 7-10 years. Green and Hemsky unreliable, and Green may or may not peak back to his previous numbers. My opinion is he'll get close to it again, but another concussion to Green or another Shoulder injury to Hemsky and they could both become unmoveable. (Hemsky already is unmoveable....) Makes sense why Green's value is high if you own him, makes sense why someone with Kane would want to push for more if they don't trust Green. Cheers.
__________________
Greatest Five to Ever Play: 1)Gretzky 2)Lemieux 3)Orr 4)Howe 5)Messier |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.












Linear Mode

