who do you like better next year? pts only.

Definitely Hamhuis

statistically speaking i would agree, my only doubt is that klesla has yet to breakout, and does not have 3 guys in front of him on the PP depth chart right?
what is klesla\'s upside?

DobberManiac wrote:
The reason I say Hamhuis is because Klesla\'s style of play virtually ensures that he will miss time during the season. Hamhuis does have 3 guys in front of him, but out of his 19 points last year, I don\'t believe any were on the pp, which I think bodes reasonably well for him this year with Timmonen\'s departure, he should get more PP time which should equal more points.
As I stated before, Klesla will get injured...for how long..who knows, but he does have scoring potential that has yet to be seen...with PP time and an injury free season, he could double his 22 points...but I would say 30 this year.

Dan Hamhuis

I agree with Dynamo. Klesla is \'bandaid\'. Hamhuis is just starting to get his act together. He does have an offensive side. He just needs the opportunity.

No question, Hamhuis.

do you see hamhuis getting a real chance to improve on his numbers? apparently he has zidlicky, weber and klein/suter infron of him on the PP.

I feel he will be used in a more defensive role again and kill PK, while logging 30 mins a game.

The likelihood of his getting pp time will diminish further if Franson makes the team. Franson has an excellent shot from the point.

I like Hamhuis the best in a straight points league, if PIM\'s were involved I would look at Klesla a lot more.

__________________
Dynasty
C-Weiss,Lombardi,Plekanec
R-Erat,Dorsett,Dvorak,
L-Versteeg,Bailey,McLeod
D-Pietrangelo,Subban,Zidlicky,Michalek
G-Kiprusoff,Mason S.

hockeylifer wrote:
dobber does not feel that Hamhuis will get any PP time citing 30 pts for him this year. then again klesla only 31 too.