![]() |
|
Login at DobberHockey | ||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
In media scrum, Kelly says he believes NHL will expand to 32 teams within "2-3 years, most likely" to Quebec City and the Toronto area Details Interesting stuff. Would be nice to see two more teams!!
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes. Especially in the most of obvious locations, the Toronto area.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Would be nice to see two more teams in Toronto and Quebec...yes for sure. BUT TAKE SOME TEAMS OUT FIRST. Teams are dying out there....
__________________
12 team H2H Keeper G,A,PP,PIM,SOG W,GAA,SV%,SO C:Giroux,Zberg,Marleau,Kadri LW:Ovi,Neal,Pach,Benn RW:Perry,MSL,Wheeler D:Yandle,Subban,Edler,OEL G: Lundqvist,Miller,MAF 12 Team H2H R,2b,3b,HR,RBI,AVG,SB,BB,K,E W,L,SV,HLD,K,ERA,WHIP C:Buck 1B:Santana 2B:Kipnis 3B:Zimmer SS:Tulo LF:Marte CF:McCutch RF:Pence Util:Ozuna SP:Cain,Moore,Latos,Kennedy,Ryu,Guthrie RP:Henderson,Rivera,League,Gregerson,Herrera DL:Hart,Anderson,Bailey |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it would be great for Toronto to finally see some NHL level hockey...
I'm kidding Leaf's fans! Yeah, 28 seems like a better number than 32... dilution of talent + more teams in high revenue areas = growth in cap = serious overpayment for midlevel talent = greater difficulties in areas like, oh I don't know, Phoenix.
__________________
Okay, so maybe nobody likes a cynic, but everybody f**king hates those perky optimists! ... and anyway, I make a damn good cynic. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Well yeah I would not want to see expansion to a team in Idaho or Wyoming or the like lol. But I'd for sure like to see Quebec get a team again. I think that'd be great revenue and good fan base = revenue.
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm against expansion of any kind for the NHL. By all means, relocate struggling teams to Toronto, Quebec City, etc., but adding more teams is NOT a good idea. I believe the talent level is diluted enough, and the amount of good hockey markets is limited. Don't dilute the talent further, and move the failing teams to places where they'll have a chance to thrive.
__________________
1 yr H2H, 10 teams G(3),A(2),+/-(1),PIM(0.2),GWG(1),W(5),SO(3) 3C-Stamkos/Kane (RW)/Shaw 3LW-Ovechkin/Lucic/Pacioretty/Ryan (RW)/Hagelin 3RW-Sharp (C)/St. Louis/Stewart/Brunner/Neil/Gallagher 4D-Pietrangelo/Goligoski/Ekman-Larsson/Leddy/Phaneuf/Beauchemin/Corvo 1G-Rinne/Ward/Anderson/Bishop +1 Util |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
So true, Godin. And then in another eight years there is a little something called a lockout that they'll want so that they can get a CBA that will help out all these struggling franchises. And so our little dance goes on and on and on.
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when you open up your mailbox and find out the previous tenant was a playboy subscriber Dallas Stars Team Coverage Dallas Stars Prospects Coverage Friday Night Studs And Duds Common Sewer of good beer |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
There should realistically only be like 24 teams with like 10 in Canada. This might be a step in the right direction in some senses but like others have said there are still some teams out there that are struggling and could probably use new homes.
__________________
Dig my Cage Match articles? Follow my blog! The Laws of Sport Also on Twitter @SteveLaidlaw |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.

















Linear Mode

