Points only League,

G = 1, A = 1, W = 2, SHTS = 2

Which side would you rather have?

Kopitar
Ryan
Hedman

For

2013 1st rounder(6-10th overall)
Landeskog
Huberdeau
Gally
Faulk

Giving up 4 players for 3 also allows me to keep an additional player for next year, lets say Damien Brunner for example?

__________________
League: 10 team, points only, keep 20

F: Tavares, Skinner, Duchene, E Kane, Huberdeau, Ovechkin, Yakupov, Galchenyuk, Granlund, Brunner, Lupul, Strome, Couturier, Scheifele Niederreiter, Dubinsky

D: Doughty, Green, Petriangelo, Ellis, Faulk, Seideberg, Larsson

G: Miller, Rinne, Schneider, Bernier

given the team you have i understand making the deal however ignoring your team i prefer what you are giving up to what you are getting

Most mysterious answer ever!!! LOL, thanks, I get your point. I have lots of prospects, but that seems like a boat load. At the same time, Kopitar and Ryan are still quite young

__________________
League: 10 team, points only, keep 20

F: Tavares, Skinner, Duchene, E Kane, Huberdeau, Ovechkin, Yakupov, Galchenyuk, Granlund, Brunner, Lupul, Strome, Couturier, Scheifele Niederreiter, Dubinsky

D: Doughty, Green, Petriangelo, Ellis, Faulk, Seideberg, Larsson

G: Miller, Rinne, Schneider, Bernier

I think it is a very level trade.

For a team rebuilding - I prefer the youth.
For a team contending - I prefer the older guys (who are still young).

I rarely rebuild, so I (me, pointing to myself) would prefer the Kopitar/Ryan side.

i prefer the one side of the deal to the other however looking at your team you cant keep most of what you are giving away anyway (other than the pick of course) so the deal is worth making as it makes your team better