Originally Posted by ovi42

I agree 100% with your player breakdown. But it's also the reason that I would take Callahan. The way I see it; at most,as said, Turris out points Callahan by 10pts at some point, but who's know when that happens. 10 Pts isn't worth waiting a couple of years for (likely) when it's potential/proven we're talking. Depending on how active you are, it may not even be relevant to your position/team by the time Turris hits 60.

Originally Posted by VincentVega

Points only, I'm going with Turris. Yes, he's more unproven than Callahan but all Callahan has proven to me is that he'll be a 50-ish point player. I like some risk and with Turris I see someone who can consistently outpoint Callahan, despite being the guy behind Spezza. Turris is riskier but I see him being a 60-point player and I don't see that in Callahan.

Originally Posted by VincentVega

Well, 10 points could make the difference between you winning your pool and not winning. I think Turris could hit 60 as early as next year, although it's somewhat unlikely. Yes, it's more likely that Callahan hits 50 than Turris 60 next year but I think Turris has a very good chance of equalling Callahan in points next year.