Banner
Fantasy Sports Forums - Dobber Sports  

Go Back   Fantasy Sports Forums - Dobber Sports > Fantasy Hockey Forum > Keeper League - Trade Talk
Login at DobberHockey

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2012, 01:46 PM
NikW71's Avatar
NikW71 NikW71 is online now
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 398
 
Location: Stratford, ON
Rep Power: 8
NikW71 is a jewel in the roughNikW71 is a jewel in the roughNikW71 is a jewel in the roughNikW71 is a jewel in the roughNikW71 is a jewel in the roughNikW71 is a jewel in the roughNikW71 is a jewel in the rough
Dobber Sports Initiate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by horrorfan View Post
That might be a more sensible option.

By the way, just a general suggestion, you should specify what type of league in your signature.
Added H2H in case that is what you were wondering about. Otherwise all the details are there

Quote:
Originally Posted by rticinelli View Post
If I'm the Crosby owner in your league, I'd have a hard time getting past the fact that you're unwilling to trade away your best player (Malkin) when you're asking me to give up the best player in the world. Simple as that.

Generally speaking, whatever you are thinking of offering is probably still not enough for Crosby.
Very good advice coming from the guy that has Crosby and Malkin lol! Interesting to hear how you acquired them instead of making it sound impossible.

I would seem to think that Malkin plus Tavares/RNH is a little to rich for my blood when arguably Malkin is the better player and more durable (although that may be the kettle calling the other black). The only thing that I can see me gaining is FOW for certain and nothing more in another category that justifies sending another blue chip player along with the so called #2. I would definitely do Tavares and RNH plus however.

Was just gauging what the value was and guess I'll wait for the other GM to get back to me and see if his demands are more reasonable. Thanks for the responses so far
__________________

16 TM H2H DYNASTY G A +- PIM PPG PPA SHP FW SOG
Hits Blks GS W SV GAA SV% SHO
3C, 3RW, 3LW,2F,6D,1Util,2G,5BN,5IR
25 Player Farm

Penguins
C- Malkin, Crosby,J Thornton, Turris, Johansen, Cullen
LW- Hall, Nash, D Brown, Cooke,
RW- Gaborik, Wheeler, Clutterback, Tarasenko, Dorsett
D-Letang, Goligoski, Salo, Girardi, Faulk, Zanon
G- MAF, Rinne, Gustavsson

Farm - Grimaldi, Faska, JT Brown, Clifford, Rinaldo, Morin, Beach, Tangradi, Pulkinnen, Spooner, Miele, C Conacher, Welsh, Komorov, Rattie, Orlov, Dehann, Klefbom, Clendening, Thrower, Irving, Kuemper, Rynnas, Hovinen

Last edited by NikW71; 12-01-2012 at 02:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2012, 04:42 PM
blayze's Avatar
blayze blayze is online now
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,252
 
Location: Toronto
Rep Power: 104
blayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond reputeblayze has a reputation beyond repute
Dobber Sports Juggernaut
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Call of Doughty View Post
Ask the other GM, "what would it take to land Crosby?" and go from there.

Instead of wondering who to move, I'd ask the other GM for a response and go from there. And hope he doesn't want to clean your cupboards. Good luck.
Contrary to what a few others in this thread believe, I think this is a very bad approach.

You want to be the person to table the FIRST offer. It sets the tone for the negotiation and more important it establishes an ANCHOR (meaning ultimately if there's a deal, it will fall closer to where the anchor was initially established). The first offer should be slightly lopsided but not to the point where it's insulting.

If someone just simply asked me what it would take to land Player X, I would shoot for the moon because I would know they are desperate, meaning I establish the anchor.

Secondly, it just shows a lack of effort and research when you just ask someone what it will take... YOU'RE the one who wants THEIR player... so YOU come up with a package that might attract their interest.

I can't imagine ANY GM in the NHL calling up Yzerman and asking "hey buddy, what would it take to get Stamkos off you" lol
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2012, 04:54 PM
arctic_rogue's Avatar
arctic_rogue arctic_rogue is online now
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,623
 
Rep Power: 16
arctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to beholdarctic_rogue is a splendid one to behold
Dobber Sports Expert
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blayze View Post
Contrary to what a few others in this thread believe, I think this is a very bad approach.

You want to be the person to table the FIRST offer. It sets the tone for the negotiation and more important it establishes an ANCHOR (meaning ultimately if there's a deal, it will fall closer to where the anchor was initially established). The first offer should be slightly lopsided but not to the point where it's insulting.

If someone just simply asked me what it would take to land Player X, I would shoot for the moon because I would know they are desperate, meaning I establish the anchor.

Secondly, it just shows a lack of effort and research when you just ask someone what it will take... YOU'RE the one who wants THEIR player... so YOU come up with a package that might attract their interest.

I can't imagine ANY GM in the NHL calling up Yzerman and asking "hey buddy, what would it take to get Stamkos off you" lol
Good point! I can't really argue with you even though it goes against what I previously said in this thread. I've had both work for me, but I really think I've had more luck with the quick question to start.

But I totally understand your point with setting the tone for the negotiation.
__________________
Ultimate Dynasty League
16 Team Dynasty League H2H: G, A, P, PPP, SHP, +/-, PIM, SOG, W, L, GAA, SvPct, SHO

C: Stamkos, Getzlaf, Carter
LW: Ovechkin, Kovalchuk, Brown
RW: Iginla, Pavelski, Horton
D: Byfuglien, J.Johnson, Goligoski, Hedman, Hamonic
U: Mueller
G: Schneider, Hiller,
B: E. Johnson, S.Kostitsyn, Neil, Biron, Giguere
IR:
Prospect: Nail Yakupov, Tangradi

__________________________________________________ ___________________________
UHL Dynasty St. Louis Blues
...a bad team trying to rebuild...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-02-2012, 12:22 AM
Dr. Gregg's Avatar
Dr. Gregg Dr. Gregg is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 404
 
Rep Power: 0
Dr. Gregg is on a distinguished road
Dobber Sports Initiate
Default

I think it is near impossible to trade for Crosby.

The opposing owner would want too much (Tavares, Hall, plus prospects or a goalie) and risk is too high coming back.

Don't destroy a very strong team for 87.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-07-2012, 11:37 AM
rticinelli's Avatar
rticinelli rticinelli is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,502
 
Location: New York, NY
Rep Power: 8
rticinelli will become famous soon enoughrticinelli will become famous soon enough
Dobber Sports Expert
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NikW71 View Post
Very good advice coming from the guy that has Crosby and Malkin lol! Interesting to hear how you acquired them instead of making it sound impossible.
I traded for Crosby after the 2006-07 season. I gave up Lecavalier, Jagr, Selanne and Brodeur for him. Remember, this was right after Lecavalier put up 108 points, Jagr followed up a 123-point campaign the year before with a 96-point season, Selanne put up 94 points for his second consecutive 90-point season, and Brodeur won the Vezina Trophy with 48 wins, 12 shutouts, and awesome GAA/SV%. So, it was a hefty price tag, and it actually took me about a year or two to rebuild my team depth.

Malkin I lucked into. Nobody in my league drafted him the first two years after his draft year because of the uncertainty over whether he would come to North America. I ended up winning the draft lottery the summer before his rookie season, when talk began of him trying to come over. So, I grabbed him with my 1st overall pick.

He's the only one of my keepers who I drafted, though. The rest were acquired via trades... sometimes paying through the nose to get the guy I wanted (Lundqvist, Crosby), and other times timing the trade so it happens before they bust out (Giroux, Letang, Yandle).

It's obviously not impossible to trade for Crosby... especially now, after two years of shaky health... but his price tag is very, very high. Even higher in the mind of his current owner than in that of the person trying to acquire him.
__________________
15 GM Keeper League w/Roto Scoring (G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, GWG | W, GAA, SV%, SHO)
Start 4 C, 4 LW, 4 RW, 6 D, 2 G (23-man rosters) | Protect 10 players w/a max of 1 goalie


C - Crosby*, Malkin* (C/R), Tavares*, Roy, Mueller
L - Marleau* (C/L), Duchene* (C/L), Doan (L/R), McLeod
R - Giroux* (C/R), Kane* (C/R), Grabner, Kassian, Boll
D - Yandle*, Letang*, McDonagh, Hamilton, Oduya, Clitsome
G - Lundqvist*, Halak, Fasth
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.