Points only: Dupuis, Malone, Glencross, Steen, Booth, Prospal, S. Kostistyn

My 1st reaction was to put them all at 50-55 pts. Yep....... still agree with this assessment.

Could any go higher? ..... Prospal would be my one year pick because of opportunity

Prospal - they'll play the crap out of him and wait til he collapses at center ice.

Steen - Looked good with Berglund and Andy Mac in the playoffs, but not great. I love Steen as he does so many things well. Still don't see anything above 50 for him with the Blues.

Dupuis - No PP time, but will play with Crosby at even strength. Meaning? I doubt he hits 60 pts again. Last year is most likely a high for his career. Solid peripheral player if you can make up PPP somewhere else.

Malone - Not sure where he fits in PP wise. Somebody might be able to chime in on this. Solid peripheral player though.

Glencross - 50 pts. Goal heavy with good PIM

Sergei - who?

Booth - I'm from Vancouver and watched him a ton. Was not impressed with his ice vision and seemed one dimensional. He was just starting to play well when he got knee mangled. His play is very similar to Kesler's (north-south) and I do not see them meshing well on the 2nd line. He's got 3rd liner written all over him as a Canuck. My personal opinion. which could change with a full healthy season. I see Booth getting above 50 if Gillis makes a move for a 2nd line play maker that isn't afraid to shoot and put up 20 goals. They need somebody who can open up ice for them. Meaning? Booth would have to go to the net more and I still don't think he's comfortable doing that. Too many ???? for me to draft Booth in shallower leagues

S. Kostitsyn
Steen
Prospal
Glencross
Dupuis
Malone
Booth

__________________
macv@dobberbaseball.com
DobberBaseball Columnist- http://baseball.dobbersports.com/ind...layout=default
Detroit Red Wings coverage
Twitter- @MacVincent1

All very similiar. I like Steen the best of the bunch here. I think he'll have best opportunities to give points.