Banner
Thread: [Waivers] Both Flames potential backups on waivers
View Single Post
  #16  
Old 01-17-2013, 03:52 PM
ericdaoust's Avatar
ericdaoust ericdaoust is online now
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,158
 
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Rep Power: 79
ericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond repute
Dobber Sports Legend
Send a message via MSN to ericdaoust
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondon View Post
So in other words they're trying to let someone else make their decision for them in the mean time lol.
That's why I want teams to call their bluff and claim both.
__________________
UHL Calgary Flames
24-team H2H (roto G, A, GWG, SHP, PPP, PIM, +/, SOG, Hits, Blks, FOW, W, SV, SV%, GAA, SO)

Capped article archive

Montreal Canadiens coverage

Twitter:@DH_EricDaoust.
Reply With Quote