Banner
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 01-04-2013, 04:55 PM
ericdaoust's Avatar
ericdaoust ericdaoust is online now
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,904
 
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Rep Power: 73
ericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond reputeericdaoust has a reputation beyond repute
Dobber Sports Legend
Send a message via MSN to ericdaoust
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LawMan View Post
I agree that players are responsible for their sticks and thats why when his stick hit the American he deserved, and received, a penalty. However when reviewing for suspensions intent is usually a large part and I don't see intent, or even reckless disregard for safety here, just a slash that took a bad bounce and hit the America in the head. Finally, as much as I hate this argument, the American skated off without injury. Given Boone Jenner's 3 games, and the other 1 game suspensions this tournament, 4 games for: an incidental high stick, without intent to injure, and no injury seems out of line to me.
Definitely agree with you about the consistency but again there is no reason for a slash so what else could be the intent? He wasn't trying to kill a mosquito on his shin pad and he wasn't making a hockey play. Sure he didn't want to hit him in the face but he still made the decision to swing the stick.
__________________
UHL Calgary Flames
24-team H2H (roto G, A, GWG, SHP, PPP, PIM, +/, SOG, Hits, Blks, FOW, W, SV, SV%, GAA, SO)

Capped article archive

Montreal Canadiens coverage

Twitter:@DH_EricDaoust.
Reply With Quote