Quote:
Originally Posted by Essej
Looking at your team again, I can't see how you wouldn't be considered the absolute favourite to win.
Unless I'm reading something wrong, you could pretty much do anything you wanted and things would be fine.
You could drop some of your lesser proven players for potential, because your team is so good. I probably wouldn't just in case of injuries, but it's an option you most certainly have with the team you have.
Defiantly much better than being a middle of the pack type team, unless again I'm reading something wrong.
|
. Thanks. Yes it's a good team (three wins in a row is not too shabby in a 24 tea, league) but always looking to improve.
__________________
24teams;26players(20roster,6bench)dynasty(full keeper);
NHL cap league based on NHL salaries (not cap hit);
pool points:
F/C: G 4pts; A 4pts; +/- 2pts
D(min5,max9): G 8pts; A 5pts; +/- 4pts
G(min2,max3): W 9pts; OTL 5pts; SO 5pts
extra points for PPP
F:Giroux,H.Sedin,D.Sedin,Kessel,St.Louis,JVR,Selan ne,Jagr,Brouwer,Dupuis,
Johansson,Conacher,Galchenyuk,Brock Nelson,Brett Ritchie
D:Markov,Enstrom,Edler,Leddy,Niskanen,Gardiner,Orl ov,Vatanen,Krug
G:Quick,Lehtonen
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever."
|
