Originally Posted by plug
Why does it seem like the union only cares about the high money players... what about the guys who had this year as only one of three years in the show? Or the minimal salary?
The cynic in me suspects it is the same reason that you see so much of US politics focus on the '1%'. High money players pay the most union dues (taxes) so they are the ones who hold most sway with the union.
But that's what a cynic would think... I'm not saying that's how it is, right?