Banner
Thread: RNH for picks?
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 11-20-2012, 10:42 PM
jman's Avatar
jman jman is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 789
 
Rep Power: 7
jman has a spectacular aura aboutjman has a spectacular aura aboutjman has a spectacular aura about
Dobber Sports Pro
Default

At first glance, I said no.

But at second glance, I'd almost do this. 8 to 5 is not bad. But getting 2nd and 10th is not bad either with that list of studs (although this is unproven talent - RNH is pretty proven IMO).

I like your idea of #1 and #10 for RNH with the conditional 11th added on if the pick slips to #2. I'd do that. That way you're looking at:

RNH for Yakupov and Huberdeau

OR

RNH for Huberdeau, Galchenyuk and Granlund

(going with the rankings).

I'd take either of these deals....
__________________
20tm UFA/RFA dynasty

Cats: G, A, SOG, STpts, +/-, hits/bs, GAA, Sv%, W+SO
Reply With Quote