There isn't a guarantee of anything, I'm simply basing my assessment on the scoring categories and the strength of the teams and how they will contribute to those scoring categories. You seem to have assumed that the format is H2H but I don't recall MD explicitly stating this in the criteria... what if it's ROTO?

We can split hairs on this, but at the end of the day, I see 2 out of 3 "projectable" categories that are pretty much a lock for Rask (that is just my opinion) even if he plays less games than Price. It's absolutely true that Rask is unproven over the course of a 60-70 game workload, but given the scoring categories as well as my personal comfort level with Rask and the Bruins as a complete, dominant team, I will take my chances with Rask any day.