Given 2 of the 3 categories are ratio-based, and how horrible the habs are going to be, I'm really at a loss to understand how anyone can justify taking Price in a one-year.
-Thomas is out, and there's no capable back-up
-Even if Price gets more wins (won't happen given how shitty the habs are), he is STILL going to lose to Rask on the Save % and GAA
-Did I mention how shitty the habs are going to be?
I could see a weak argument being made if saves were a category, but given the 3 categories named, it's about quality over quantity. I'm dumbfounded that some of you view this as even remotely close.
edit: I will say that I didn't even know Rask is injured, so if that's a serious factor here than I have to revisit this, but that aside, it's a no brainer.
Last edited by blayze; 10-24-2012 at 01:47 PM.