Clarke MacArthur was awarded $2.4 million in arbitration today and the Thrashers have indeed decided to walk away from it. MacArthur is now an unrestricted free agent.

 

David Perron has signed a two-year contract for $4.3 million.

 

Joffrey Lupul reported on his Twitter account that he will undergo an MRI on his back today. He only recently began skating again and apparently the back is still bothering him. I'm moving him from "sleeper" to "high risk" now, but will follow closely.

 

Some of you long-time readers may remember Thieving Giraffe from the forum. Well, he's been tied up in law school for several years now, but still checks in from time to time. He had this to say about the Kovalchuk issue, from a legal standpoint:

"As dual legal/hockey junky, I got all hopped up evaluating the legality and basis for this veto. Thought I'd share my thoughts, if you're interested. The veto is reportedly based upon Section 26.3 of the CBA, which reads as follows:

CBA § 26.3: (a) No Club or Club Actor, directly or indirectly, may: (i) enter into any agreements, promises, undertakings, representations, commitments, inducements, assurances of intent, or understandings of any kind, whether express, implied, oral or written, including without limitation, any SPC, Qualifying Offer, Offer Sheet or other transaction, or (ii) take or fail to take any action whatsoever, if either (i) or (ii) is intended to or has the effect of defeating or Circumventing the provisions of this Agreement or the intention of the parties as reflected by the provisions of this Agreement, including without limitation, provisions with respect to the financial and other reporting obligations of the Clubs and the League, Team Payroll Range, Player Compensation Cost Redistribution System, the Entry Level System and/or Free Agency.

Obviously that's a lot of excess provisions for the current situation. Reduced to what's relevant, Section 26.3 reads:

CBA § 26.3: No Club or Club Actor, directly or indirectly, may: (i) enter into any agreements… if… (i)… is intended to or has the effect of defeating or Circumventing the provisions of this Agreement… including without limitation, provisions with respect to… Team Payroll Range… and/or Free Agency.

If GB is smart, he will omit any mention of intent, because frankly he does not have to show a lack of good faith in order to veto the agreement (and obviously there's no need to go out of his way to insult Lou). Therefore, an arbitrator would not have to find that the deal was intended to circumvent the salary cap or that good faith had been breached, but rather simply that those final years at roughly a half-million per would have such an effect. Doesn't seem like a very hard sell to me." - Mike Yedinak (Thieving Giraffe)

 

The Ducks have signed Danny Syvret to a two-way deal. He becomes the new Brian Salcido there - dominant offensive AHL player and part-time NHL player. Salcido will play in the Czech League this year.

 

Erik Johnson on Twitter: "Haven't we seen some contracts similar to Kovalchuks that were accepted by the league? Why now?"

I'll answer that - the NHL didn't want to approve the Hossa or Luongo deals, but figured if they could just make it to the next CBA without things getting even worse, then they'd be okay. No need to open up a can of worms by rejecting the contracts. But of course, if you give a GM an inch, they'll take a mile. They'll push it a little further each time. So the NHL had to do something this time, because Lou proved that the GM's will just keep pushing and pushing otherwise. The next deal could be for 20 years. Then 30? Nope. The NHL tried to give the players and the GM's rope to run things by themselves and as is human nature, greed pushed things too far.

 

Chris Vivlamore reports that Clarke MacArthur's arbitration is today and that the Thrashers will probably walk away from the award if it's anything like $2 million. So MacArthur will be an unrestricted free agent in the event that happens. Stay tuned...

 

You have to consider that the KHL creeps back into Kovalchuk's future. Did he burn his bridges in LA? I think so. Either the NHLPA appeals this (they will) and they win their case (they probably will), or NJ reconfigures the contract and he agrees. Or Door#3 - the KHL sneaks back in there...

 

I'll be doing New Jersey last in my fantasy guide. Thank goodness I didn't get to them yet. I would have to re-write the entire thing because of this. Guide is out in 11 days, and if you like Paypal, you must buy before then. If you don't like Paypal, wait until my new shopping cart is up (end of the month) - the new cart adds more security, more simplicity and fewer clicks.

 

The Flames have signed Stefan Meyer to a two-year contract.

 

The Hurricanes have signed Brett Carson to a one-year, two-way deal.

 

The Habs have signed prospect goaltender Cedric Desjardins to a contract. The 24-year-old deserves a promotion, but as it stands he is the No.3 goalie in the system.

 

Starting the Wednesday's ramblings early because of the Ilya Kovalchuk news that has emerged on TSN. The NHL has apparently rejected the Kovalchuk contract due to cap circumvention. They apparently found it difficult to believe that Kovy would 1) still be playing in the NHL when he is in his 40s and 2) still play when his salary would be the NHL minimum during those years. There is a clause in the CBA that allows the NHL to reject a contract if the spirit of the CBA is violated. More to come. Meanwhile, discuss...

 

Guess, from my "child" analogy from yesterday, the NHL (parents) have given Lou a spanking. When they say "don't touch that" they really mean don't touch it (read the analogy to understand what I'm saying here)


Write comment
Comments (14)add comment

mike hess said:

SharkMeat
let's not Demonize Whoa....I think the Devils did a great job of keeping a major hockey star in the NHL and not sending him to the KHL. Yes there are issues about the length and impact to the salary cap, but let's talk about all the issues. I don't want to be sitting in North America having to watch the KHL to get my hockey.
Given the Hossa and Luongo contracts modification to meet the intent of the salary cap will be required for sure. I am sure that Lou has a backup..smilies/grin.gif
July 21, 2010
Votes: +0

Santo aka Ross10019 said:

ross10019
... I agree with Thievery's comments, and it is interesting to note the potential penalties against the Devils for this transgression (ranging from $1M to $5M penalty applied to the cap), but the CBA at 26.3(c) also makes Kovalchuk liable for this activity.
July 21, 2010
Votes: +0

Dobber said:

Dobber
... Lou is Bettman's closest friend and supporter among all the GM's. Bettman did not single him out, his hand was forced. I explained above, he tried to give the GM's rope to handle things themselves, but they abused it more and more and he had to stop it before it got even more out of control - and it would.
July 21, 2010
Votes: +0

Puckhead said:

Puckhead
... I would agree with Bettman having stones enough to call the deal back, if not for the manta others he let slide. This looks like he chose to act on Lou's circumvention, maybe as payback for the burying Mogilny to the minors, and using LTIR in the early stages of the post lockout NHL. Lou is always well within the rules, but Bettman doesn't like a genius poking holes in a well formulated plan like the CBA (tongue in cheek).
July 21, 2010
Votes: +0

Dobber said:

Dobber
Jerry Yep. Now who will wake up to find the horse's head in his bed? Bettman? LOL
July 21, 2010
Votes: +0

Dobber said:

Dobber
... Oops - damn, I did that Sunday as well, called it June 18
July 21, 2010
Votes: +0

Puckhead said:

Puckhead
Time flies when you're reading Dobberhockey!!! Dobber you are clearly overworked trying to finish up your fantasy guide...January 21st? It's not like we don't appreciate your tireless efforts buddy!!!
July 21, 2010
Votes: +0

RNS said:

sexymountain
... The only door Kovalchuk would agree to is the backdoor.
July 21, 2010
Votes: -1

Jerry said:

CallMeJerry
... The NHL brass are generally a clown show when it comes to the administration of the league but I've got to tip my hat to them on this occasion. Standing up to Uncle Lou takes some big stones.
July 20, 2010
Votes: +0

Finnbar said:

jokerit72
What is the difference..... between this Kovy contract and the other deals handed out to Hossa, Luongo, Richards et al in recent years?
I mean, I'm too lazy to do the homework on those guys' "actual" salary in 2019, but wasn't Hossa going to get 1.0 M per at the end of his deal?
Why would the league choose NOW to get all hot & bothered?

Not that I care either way, but one would think the NHLPA and/or the Devils (don't mess with them!) would almost be able to sue the league here for indiscriminate discrimination....

Oh, and BTW, is Kovalchuk totally insane?
Take a 2 or 3 or 5-year deal worth 8.0 M a year, sign another one later; it'll add up to way more than 100 million by the time you're done....

July 20, 2010
Votes: +0

littleranger said:

littleranger
Ilya Wowwwwww I can only imagine what would happen if he signed with the Kings now! This is amazing news! Too bad he'll now be the talk of the summer for the next 2 months now...
July 20, 2010
Votes: -1

Dobber said:

Dobber
... Repent - go to your room. Now!
July 20, 2010
Votes: +1

Repent Tokyo said:

repenttokyo
sounds like dobber's got a baaaaaad case of parenthood! lol. it's the dobber / cosby show!
July 20, 2010
Votes: +1

notoriousjim said:

notoriousjim
... i am so happy that they shot that down. There is a front loaded contract, and then there is this garbage. You could argue that he would be worth the minimum at the end of his career, but i still do not see enough players past 40 to make me think he actually plans on playing to the end of the contract.

Personally, if i ran the NHL i would add the stipulation that he has to repay he per year salary each year if he retires before the end of the contract. So if he retires in year 10, and has collected 80 million, the 24 million would cover the first 4 years, and the last 3 years of the contract he would need to repay the devils 6 million each of those years.
July 20, 2010
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy