| DobberHockey`s Expert Panel - Third Round | Tweet |
 |
 |
 |
| Written by Jeff Angus | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, 16 May 2010 00:14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Here are the individual and averaged predicitions for the third round of the NHL playoffs from Dobber, Angus, Bugg, Ma, Miller, and more! The panel's consensus picks were 12-3 last year, and we boast an impressive 34-11 record over the past three seasons! However, this season the panel has struggled a bit. Matt Bugg has been the most successful, going 9-3 through the first two rounds.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Write comment
Comments (4)
GMGates / 'Gatticus'
said:
|
Subscribe to this comment's feed |
... How is the consensus MTL in 7? PHI has 7 votes compared to MTL's 6. 3 voted for MTL in 7, 3 voted for PHI in 7 yet 4 voted for PHI in 6... wouldn't the consensus be PHI in 6? |
Mabus
said:
 |
... It would be interesting to add a vegas odds column. The most interesting lines are the times that the panel disagrees with the betting community - like Detroit/SJ last series. Mabus |
Dobber
said:
 |
... And that, my friends, is why I'm getting my ass kicked in every playoff pool this year. And it was so promising, too...  |
praba
said:
 |
... it's okay to have a bad record this year, no one would have thought the eastern conference finals would have had 7 vs 8. |
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
