| Earmarked for Success Part III | Tweet |
|
|
|
| Written by Ryan Ma | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 28 July 2009 11:28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It boils down to optimal playing time. A top-line player will get the best of everything, while a top-six player will receive decent even strength/second unit power-play ice-time. A bottom feeder will most likely receive checking line ice-time and less optimal scoring ice-time, which will hamper their scoring ability during the season. Their big break will only come if there are injuries or big sophomore slumps from their team’s top-six. There really isn’t a sense in projection 80 points for a player who isn’t even on a team’s top-line let alone top-six.
Note: Take the line combos with a grain of salt. They are just arbitrary and are used primarily to separate a team’s top-six from the bottom-six. I really don’t want to get into arguments about how Bobby Ryan is going to line up alongside Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry instead of Joffrey Lupul. Nashville – Weak top six, lots of room for competition Bottom Feeders Phoenix– Complete gong-show - Top Six Bottom Feeders San Jose- Top-six fairly certain, faces shallow competition
Bottom Feeders St. Louis – Top-six uncertain faces stiff competition Bottom Feeders Vancouver – Top-six locked, faces shallow competition Bottom Feeders
Questions or comments? Like always I’ll be ready and willing to discuss them in the comments section below. Stay tuned on Thursday where Russ Miller will finish off this series with the final five teams of the Eastern Conference. Also check out the 2009-10 Dobber guide as I have a column involving 20 plus sleepers from the Western Conference that you should pay attention to heading into next season.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Write comment
Comments (7)
![]()
Gotlaid
said:
|
|
... RE: Phoenix They're to the point where I just don't care about them anymore. It's honestly one boneheaded move after another... They have to open their eyes and look around, look at Pittsburgh, Washington, Chicago, St. Louis, LA... they were all in same boat at Phoenix 4-5 years ago and where are they now compared to Phoenix. It's a pretty foolproof system. Do bad in standings, get high draft pick. 1) If the draft pick is good enough, clear everything on your roster and let them play big minutes. 2) if they aren't good enough stick them in juniors/minors for a year and let them develop properly. (Chi did it with Toews when they drafted him, so I don't see a problem with that) Don't keep them in the big leagues and stick them in third line duties where they'll only play 11 minutes or less a game, what does that do for their development? I could understand last season, where they might just be testing waters to see if they could strike gold since they didn't have much to play for anyways, but then they go on and add Vrbata, Fiddler, and Korpikoski in the off-season so now that jams up another three spots in your line up. When's Turris, Boedkker, Tikhonov, Mueller going to get the time to develop now? Especially if you have to spread the time to all of those new acquisitions as well as Doan/Lombardi/Upshall. And to think they want to add Tanguay to the mix too, that'll just mess up their team even more. /rant |
|
Gotlaid
said:
|
... RE: Backes I love Backes to death, if you followed my columns last season, I pretty much wrote about him every week. The thing you have to consider is that last season the Blues were hampered with a ton of injuries, Kariya, Andy Mac... so Backes really stepped up to fill those shoes, but now that they all have returned, there isn't a place for him in the Blues lineup anymore. The Blues are VERY DEEP! Just look at the depth chart above, Kariya, McDonald, Boyes (pretty much unmovable) Oshie, Berglund, Perron (great chemistry last year, there is a bit of room for Backes to crack that line, but he's going to have to outshine them all, which is going to be a tough task.) And you throw in Tkachuk, so as of right now Backes sits 8th on the depth charts. So you have to go in thinking if he's 8th on the depth chart, is he really going to repeat 54 points, 208 SOG, and 165 PIMs? chances are NO! |
|
Gotlaid
said:
|
... RE: Seto To be honest, I think it more so due to the fact that they want to re-structure the system. Face it after two years of major disappointments something has to change, it's like the old addage, you're an idiot if you continue to do what you're doing and expecting a different result. If you kind of look at the successful teams, what they have is offensive depth, Detroit had 3 lines rolling, Pittsburgh did too. So having Seto move down on the third line with newcomer McGinn, which from what I read is pretty offensive, that could provide that potent third line where it'll spread out the offense more. I think it'll be more effective than having all the eggs in one basket of JT, Marleau and Seto and having them face shut down lines all season long. San Jose needs to do something to win fans over, winning the President's trophy just isn't enough anymore. |
|
Enormous
said:
|
... Seto should start the yr with Joe again. Agree time to move on from Cheechoo. I can see Vrbata getting a top 6 over Prucha or Boedker. The 6th forward will be very hard to predict. Anyone of those could replace Ward Man, is StL deep. Backes and Perron not even a top 6? Time to move one of them for another D! Wonder where Tanguay will fit in Phx if that gets done - Tanguay-Turris/Lom-Doan |
|
Ron`
said:
|
... Good analysis of the Blues. Tkachuk will still garner qualite minutes likely on the PP so that pushes him to the second line at least. Hopefully Kariya is all mended, nothing suggests he isn't. It's Perron's oppurtunity to replace Tkachuk going forward.... |
|
BladesOfSteel
said:
|
... ^ The only reason Cheech may see top line minutes is because they are looking to move him, but I agree, Setoguchi is a lock for top 6 in San Jose. Also, how does David Backes not crack the top 6 in St. Louis? |
|
Renegade
said:
|
... Setoguchi on the third line?! Seriously SJ? How many chances are you going to give Cheechoo before you realize he's lost his game just like David Duval did. |
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






