Nyquist clip added below...

I'm getting this nagging feeling that won't go away. Teams are experimenting like crazy and taking the losses for half a season … and then they stop just in time to surge into the playoffs. New York, Washington, Detroit and San Jose did that this year. And of course, we remember the Kings from a year ago. Hopeless, completely hopeless…and then at the midpoint the wins come. Detroit looks really good. New York looked really good in the first round against a similar 'late surging' team the Capitals. Anyway, I won't go any further with this theory unless the Wings upset the Hawks. But if that happens, I'd have to wonder if we'll see a lot of dominant teams in the regular season - with records puffed up by playing against 'experimenting' teams, suddenly get wiped out in the playoffs when those same teams stop with the experiments.

Examples of experiments - Brunner was an 17-minute player for Detroit, Ovechkin moves to the right wing, etc.

The Gustav Nyquist - Joakim Andersson - Damien Brunner line looks like a keeper. The problem is, I think Brunner goes back with Zetterberg in the regular season. But if this line remains together, Andersson benefits. He's a two-way center playing with a pair of offensive geniuses. The collateral points he could earn would potentially be huge.

Nyquist's goal last night by the way - gorgeous. Still trying to get a clip. UPDATE: Got the clip, here it is - enjoy this sweet goal:

 

 

 

 

Speaking of huge, Brunner's playoff performance has been huge. Eight points in 10 games. He's adjusted to the NHL now and I expect a big year from him. Assuming the Wings can afford to keep him. He's a UFA and the team has a few free agents to sign and somebody has to go. He saw just 9:15 of ice time last night despite his production.

*

Don't blame Toews for the loss - the guy had seven shots and three hits.

Stalberg was back in the lineup for Chicago but played just 9:25. Still in the doghouse.

Dave Bolland, a proven playoff stud, has been back for three games now but is still pointless and minus-2.

Justin Abdelkader is seeing a lot of ice time in these playoffs and here is an example of why - six hits and five shots on goal last night. He's starting to blossom into the power forward the Wings were hoping he'd become.

*

I missed this fascinating article earlier in the month, you may have caught it but I'll pass it along anyway. Puck Daddy explores how a couple of Sharks' fans smuggled a shark into the arena and threw it on the ice after a goal. Great stuff.

*

The Sabres re-signed John Scott for one more year.

I mentioned in the ramblings yesterday, later in the day (it's the offseason now, so more updates are added to the ramblings later in the day, as with every summer) - Wojtek Wolski has signed to play in the KHL. Mark Dekanich has also signed to play there.

*

Brendan Ross has the latest Prospect Ramblings up over at DobberProspects. Be sure to check it out as he follows the 2013 NHL Draft class and the 2013 CHL Memorial Cup.

 

*

 

No goal! What do you think of his, gang? No interference, nothing wrong with this - what would have been the tying goal. All I can come up with is the old 'intent to blow' bullshit that they threw at us a few years ago since the ref started to raise his arm as the puck crossed the line. Not that Chicago deserved the game, but they deserved the goal.

*

Kronwalled - a TSN feature:

*

Here's another good clip if you didn't catch this one. You know I love candid coaches and athletes - from Roenick to Avery to Tortorella, I love them all. Here is Torts on why Carl Hagelin is not being used on the power play:

 


Write comment
Comments (5)add comment

bitterwingsfan said:

bitterwingsfan
no goal I was pretty stunned that the Hawks' second goal was disallowed - seemed like it was legit even though I was perfectly OK with it not counting as a biased viewer. I did see someone post this in the comments on the PD article, though, and maybe this was the justification?

NHL official rules - Table 18 - Rule 69 - Interference on the Goalkeeper Situations 5. Screening Situations item D (http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26557)

Situation: An attacking player plants himself within the goal crease, as to obstruct the goalkeeper’s vision and impair his ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored.

Result: Goal is disallowed. The announcement should be, “No goal due to interference with the goalkeeper.”

I'd say even that application of the rule was pretty soft but the ref was standing right there and seemed emphatic about the call.


Oh, and regarding the 3rd line, they've definitely been money this postseason. I almost wonder if the Wings let Filppula walk in the offseason because of his asking price, inconsistent production so far (5pts, -2) and the success the younger players are enjoying (not to mention the ones leading Grand Rapids as well). Future not quite as bleak as it may have seemed a year ago.
May 21, 2013
Votes: +0

Pengwin7 said:

Pengwin7
Nyqvist Goal I don't know a source for the video either... but I will say this:
ESPN has a game recap with video and they do a nice little job of putting the ol' circle around Nyqvist and showing the break-out.
http://scores.espn.go.com/nhl/recap?gameId=400465768

I actually emailed it to my men's league hockey team.
It's a really nice example of where a team should line-up on defensive zone draw and how they all go to the correct locations for a potential break-out.

The finish by Nyqvist is the cherry on top... but it's text-book stuff by the Wings.
May 21, 2013
Votes: +0

kaverorzi said:

kaverorzi
... now that the wings don't have Holmstrom calls like that on other teams fill me with absolute joy. smilies/grin.gif
May 21, 2013
Votes: +1

kaverorzi said:

kaverorzi
... now that the wings don't have Holmstrom calls like that on other teams fill me with absolute joy. smilies/grin.gif
May 21, 2013
Votes: +0

Corstyles said:

Corstyles
No goal Tough call for the Hawks, but I think it was the right one.
You're not allowed to hang out in the crease. That's the goalie's area. You can pass through the crease as a goal is being scored; you can follow a puck in there and bang away at it till it goes in; but you can't hang out in there and wait for somebody else to score.

All that being said, I'm not sure if it would have been disallowed if Shaw hadn't given Howard a little cross-check in the mask about a tenth of a second after the puck went in. That just kinda drove the point home that Shaw was in there to screw with Howard, even if he didn't contact him before the puck went in.
May 21, 2013
Votes: +2
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy